Impermanent Loss

What Is Impermanent Loss?

Impermanent loss occurs when a liquidity provider on a decentralized exchange (DEX) experiences a reduction in value compared to simply holding the assets outside the pool. This happens due to price discrepancies between the two assets in the pool, often a cryptocurrency and a stablecoin (e.g., USDC). The loss is considered “impermanent” because it only becomes permanent when the liquidity provider withdraws their funds from the pool.

How Does Impermanent Loss Work?

Impermanent loss arises from price movements that alter the ratio of assets in a liquidity pool. Here’s how it happens:

Imagine a liquidity provider deposits equal amounts of ETH and USDC into a pool on a DEX. If the price of ETH rises significantly, the pool’s ETH becomes undervalued relative to the market price. This creates an arbitrage opportunity for traders, who buy the cheaper ETH from the pool until the price equilibrium is restored.

After arbitrage, the liquidity provider ends up with more USDC and less ETH than initially deposited. The value of the remaining portfolio may be lower compared to simply holding the original assets, resulting in impermanent loss.

The impermanent loss becomes permanent if the provider withdraws their funds after the price shift. If the assets in the pool return to their original price ratios, the loss diminishes or disappears.

How to Avoid Impermanent Loss

While impermanent loss is an inherent risk of liquidity provision, strategies exist to minimize its impact:

  • Use Stablecoins: Pairing stablecoins like USDC and DAI or wrapped versions of the same assets (e.g., wBTC) can reduce impermanent loss since their prices remain relatively stable.
  • Utilize Weighted Pools: Protocols like Balancer allow liquidity pools with arbitrary weights (e.g., 80/20 instead of 50/50). Heavier weight in one token reduces exposure to price fluctuations in the other.
  • Leverage Price Oracles: Platforms like Bancor use price oracles to adjust liquidity pool ratios dynamically, mitigating the effects of price discrepancies.
  • Single-Sided Liquidity Pools: Some protocols, such as Tokemak, offer single-sided liquidity options. These pools use the protocol’s native token to absorb the impermanent loss, compensating liquidity providers with swap fees and rewards.
  • Correlated Asset Pairing: Providing liquidity for well-correlated asset pairs, like wBTC and BTC, minimizes the risk of price divergence, helping to balance the portfolio value.

Conclusion

Impermanent loss is an unavoidable risk for liquidity providers in decentralized finance. However, by employing strategies like using stablecoin pairs, utilizing advanced pool configurations, and choosing correlated asset pairs, providers can mitigate the potential impact. It’s crucial to evaluate the risks and rewards of liquidity provision carefully before committing assets to a pool.